xref: /aosp_15_r20/external/clang/test/SemaCXX/deleted-operator.cpp (revision 67e74705e28f6214e480b399dd47ea732279e315)
1*67e74705SXin Li // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
2*67e74705SXin Li 
3*67e74705SXin Li struct PR10757 {
4*67e74705SXin Li   bool operator~() = delete; // expected-note {{explicitly deleted}}
5*67e74705SXin Li   bool operator==(const PR10757&) = delete; // expected-note {{explicitly deleted}}
6*67e74705SXin Li   operator float();
7*67e74705SXin Li };
PR10757f()8*67e74705SXin Li int PR10757f() {
9*67e74705SXin Li   PR10757 a1;
10*67e74705SXin Li   // FIXME: We get a ridiculous number of "built-in candidate" notes here...
11*67e74705SXin Li   if(~a1) {} // expected-error {{overload resolution selected deleted operator}} expected-note 8 {{built-in candidate}}
12*67e74705SXin Li   if(a1==a1) {} // expected-error {{overload resolution selected deleted operator}} expected-note 144 {{built-in candidate}}
13*67e74705SXin Li }
14*67e74705SXin Li 
15*67e74705SXin Li struct DelOpDel {
16*67e74705SXin Li   // FIXME: In MS ABI, we error twice below.
~DelOpDelDelOpDel17*67e74705SXin Li   virtual ~DelOpDel() {} // expected-error 1-2 {{attempt to use a deleted function}}
18*67e74705SXin Li   void operator delete(void*) = delete; // expected-note 1-2 {{deleted here}}
19*67e74705SXin Li };
20