1*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; RUN: llc < %s -march=x86-64 | grep cvtsi2sd 2*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker 3*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; LSR previously eliminated the sitofp by introducing an induction 4*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; variable which stepped by a bogus ((double)UINT32_C(-1)). It's theoretically 5*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; possible to eliminate the sitofp using a proper -1.0 step though; this 6*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker; test should be changed if that is done. 7*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker 8*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdefine void @foo(i32 %N) nounwind { 9*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerentry: 10*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker %0 = icmp slt i32 %N, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1] 11*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker br i1 %0, label %bb, label %return 12*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker 13*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerbb: ; preds = %bb, %entry 14*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker %i.03 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %2, %bb ] ; <i32> [#uses=2] 15*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker %1 = sitofp i32 %i.03 to double ; <double> [#uses=1] 16*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker tail call void @bar(double %1) nounwind 17*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker %2 = add nsw i32 %i.03, -1 ; <i32> [#uses=2] 18*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %2, %N ; <i1> [#uses=1] 19*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker br i1 %exitcond, label %return, label %bb 20*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker 21*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerreturn: ; preds = %bb, %entry 22*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker ret void 23*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker} 24*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker 25*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Workerdeclare void @bar(double) 26