xref: /aosp_15_r20/external/llvm/test/MC/X86/intel-syntax-error.s (revision 9880d6810fe72a1726cb53787c6711e909410d58)
1*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker// RUN: not llvm-mc -triple i686-unknown-unknown -x86-asm-syntax=att %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
2*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
3*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker// This tests weird forms of Intel and AT&T syntax that gas accepts that we
4*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker// don't.  The [no]prefix operand of the syntax directive indicates whether
5*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker// registers need a '%' prefix.
6*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker
7*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker.intel_syntax prefix
8*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker// CHECK: error: '.intel_syntax prefix' is not supported: registers must not have a '%' prefix in .intel_syntax
9*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker_test2:
10*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker	mov	DWORD PTR [%esp - 4], 257
11*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker.att_syntax noprefix
12*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker// CHECK: error: '.att_syntax noprefix' is not supported: registers must have a '%' prefix in .att_syntax
13*9880d681SAndroid Build Coastguard Worker	movl	$257, -4(esp)
14